Which conclusion about Top 100 girls' names as a share of all births is supported?

Which conclusion about Top 100 girls' names as a share of all births is supported?

• A. Parents are given greater freedom to choose more diverse names.
• B. The top 100 names account for nearly all births.
• C. Names are becoming less diverse because parents choose only historical names.
• D. The top name dominates and diversity declines.

Answer: (A)

Naming diversity rises when the share of births among the Top 100 girls’ names drops. If fewer births go to those top names, more parents are choosing from a wider pool of names, indicating greater freedom to pick diverse names. That’s why the supported conclusion is that parents are given greater freedom to choose more diverse names. The other options imply either heavy concentration (Top 100 dominating) or shrinking diversity (only historical names, or the top name dominating), which isn’t consistent with a declining Top 100 share.

Naming diversity rises when the share of births among the Top 100 girls’ names drops. If fewer births go to those top names, more parents are choosing from a wider pool of names, indicating greater freedom to pick diverse names. That’s why the supported conclusion is that parents are given greater freedom to choose more diverse names. The other options imply either heavy concentration (Top 100 dominating) or shrinking diversity (only historical names, or the top name dominating), which isn’t consistent with a declining Top 100 share.